The submissions would be evaluated as per following:
STAGE-1 |
Consultant’s evaluation |
Student’s Evaluation |
Team Composition |
5 |
0 |
Adherence to Design Brief (Both Generic and station specific) |
5 |
10 |
Station complex Functionality |
20 |
20 |
Transportation Aspects |
20 |
20 |
Architecture, innovative design |
35 |
40 |
Economic Aspects |
5 |
0 |
Utility and Sustainability |
5 |
5 |
Implementability and constructability |
5 |
5 |
Stage-2 entries of all qualifying Catergory-1 (Consultants) Participants would first pass through technical evaluation by the jurors as per marking criteria mentioned below.
Sl. No. |
Marking Criteria |
Sub Score |
Total Score |
1 |
Station complex Functionality |
||
1.a |
Passenger movement and Segregation |
5 |
15 |
1.b |
Station Amenities |
5 |
|
1.c |
Emergency evacuation |
5 |
|
2 |
Previous Experience in railway station design |
5 |
|
3 |
Transportation Aspects |
||
3.a |
Station access and dispersal |
4 |
20 |
3.b |
Universal accessibility |
4 |
|
3.c |
Seamless Integration with surrounding uses and transit modes |
4 |
|
3.d |
Parking & Circulation |
4 |
|
3.e |
Traffic circulation around station area (impact and mitigation) |
4 |
|
4 |
Architecture, creative value |
||
4.1 |
Creative Value of the Design |
5 |
15 |
4.2 |
Internal Circulation |
5 |
|
4.3 |
Quality of the Urban Design proposal |
5 |
|
5 |
Economic Aspects |
||
5.a |
Real Estate Value capture (maximization) |
5 |
20 |
5.b |
Integration of Station and proposed commercial development |
10 |
|
5.c |
Financial Sustainability |
5 |
|
6 |
Utility and Sustainability |
||
6.a |
Water & Waste Management |
5 |
15 |
6.b |
Energy Efficiency |
5 |
|
6.c |
Landscaping |
5 |
|
7 |
Implementability and constructability |
10 |
|
Total (ST) |
100 |
IRSDC aims to implement the best schemes selected through the competition while upholding the spirit of the CVC guidelines. Accordingly, the Right of First Refusal (ROFR) shall be given to the Consultants scoring highest marks for technical evaluation (for respective station areas).
Following process would be followed by the evaluation committee of IRSDC in presence of Consultants participating in Stage-2 who choose to attend, competition advisors/ assessors, etc:
In the event, the highest technical scoring Consultant does not agree to work at the lowest quote, received from the three highest technical scorers of the respective station areas, the Financial Proposal of the highest three technical Consultants shall be evaluated as per the QCBS process mentioned below and a combined techno-financial score would be disclosed to announce the first, second and third prize winners of the competition for each station and in accordance with provision mentioned in the competition dossier.
In case of a shortlisted Consultant having submitted Proposals in Stage-2 for more than one station, IRSDC shall finalize and award the work which is best suitable and economical to IRSDC. In such case, Priority of finalization of the award of contract for individual station after Stage 2 of competition will be the sole decision of IRSDC.