Evaluation of Entries

Evaluation of submitted entries in Stage-1

The submissions would be evaluated as per following:

STAGE-1	Consultant’s evaluation	Student’s Evaluation
Team Composition	5	0
Adherence to Design Brief (Both Generic and station specific)	5	10
Station complex Functionality	20	20
Transportation Aspects	20	20
Architecture, innovative design	35	40
Economic Aspects	5	0
Utility and Sustainability	5	5
Implementability and constructability	5	5

Evaluation of submitted entries in Stage-2

Stage-2 entries of all qualifying Catergory-1 (Consultants) Participants would first pass through technical evaluation by the jurors as per marking criteria mentioned below.

Sl. No.	Marking Criteria	Sub Score	Total Score
1	Station complex Functionality
1.a	Passenger movement and Segregation	5	15
1.b	Station Amenities	5
1.c	Emergency evacuation	5
2	Previous Experience in railway station design		5
3	Transportation Aspects
3.a	Station access and dispersal	4	20
3.b	Universal accessibility	4
3.c	Seamless Integration with surrounding uses and transit modes	4
3.d	Parking & Circulation	4
3.e	Traffic circulation around station area (impact and mitigation)	4
4	Architecture, creative value
4.1	Creative Value of the Design	5	15
4.2	Internal Circulation	5
4.3	Quality of the Urban Design proposal	5
5	Economic Aspects
5.a	Real Estate Value capture (maximization)	5	20
5.b	Integration of Station and proposed commercial development	10
5.c	Financial Sustainability	5
6	Utility and Sustainability
6.a	Water & Waste Management	5	15
6.b	Energy Efficiency	5
6.c	Landscaping	5
7	Implementability and constructability		10
	Total (ST)		100

Process of selection of winners in Stage-2

Right of First Refusal (ROFR)

IRSDC aims to implement the best schemes selected through the competition while upholding the spirit of the CVC guidelines. Accordingly, the Right of First Refusal (ROFR) shall be given to the Consultants scoring highest marks for technical evaluation (for respective station areas).

Following process would be followed by the evaluation committee of IRSDC in presence of Consultants participating in Stage-2 who choose to attend, competition advisors/ assessors, etc:

Financial Proposals for first three Consultants with highest technical scores shall be opened.
Under “right to first refusal”, the Consultant scoring highest technical score shall be given the opportunity to accept to work at the lowest Financial Proposal received amongst the three highest technical scorers of the respective station areas.
In the event that the highest technical scoring Consultant accepts to work at the lowest quote, the same will be declared the competition winner and the process would be stopped here. Further evaluation of financial proposals based on QCBS method mentioned in Clause 6.5 below will not be done. In such case, only technical score of the winning entries would be used to declare the first, second and third prize winners for each station.

In the event, the highest technical scoring Consultant does not agree to work at the lowest quote, received from the three highest technical scorers of the respective station areas, the Financial Proposal of the highest three technical Consultants shall be evaluated as per the QCBS process mentioned below and a combined techno-financial score would be disclosed to announce the first, second and third prize winners of the competition for each station and in accordance with provision mentioned in the competition dossier.

In case of a shortlisted Consultant having submitted Proposals in Stage-2 for more than one station, IRSDC shall finalize and award the work which is best suitable and economical to IRSDC. In such case, Priority of finalization of the award of contract for individual station after Stage 2 of competition will be the sole decision of IRSDC.